CMPL: Alzherimer's Scam

Alzheimer's Scam Report

Extracted from a book titled the CMPL. Steps and explanations. Assume the main study case was a period around 2008, however, it is unlikely anything has changed. The study is from Australia and the State of New South Wales (NSW), however, the techniques may apply in other jurisdictions and countries. Afterwards a discussion. The CMPL suggests that the intellectual capacity of magistrates and judges reduces to those of a 12-year-old. Google Gemini (an AI), after being explained the research, appears to have agreed that the result is likely valid and is related to the restricted way in which lawyers have to present information.

Step 1. Wait until your parent, but this could work for a next door neighbor, is incontinent both ways and has no memory of recent events. By this time he or she no longer understands how to use the telephone or to answer when such rings. At this point you pretend to fall and call police claiming you were assaulted by your brother or cousin (someone who regularly visits your Alzheimer’s parent). The police are not likely to take this seriously since there would be no evidence of assault - but that doesn’t matter because in Australia in NSW any lawyer can apply for an AVO with no evidence of need required. A person simply claims he or she is afraid of so and so. Such a claimant may act afraid too. An AVO, apprehended violence order, is in theory to protect a person from violence. When applied for by police there is likely a demonstrated need. When applied for by a lawyer then it is a scam. Thus a lawyer now applies for an AVO isolating the Alzheimer’s parent from members of the family especially the person who has the legal ‘power of attorney’. Ideally this works very well when the claimant lives with the parent, but this is not considered essential.

Step 2. An application may be made to a tribunal, by a sibling knowing full well why an AVO was put into place. to appoint someone to look after the parent’s assets. If you have an AVO ready, and that AVO can hand over access to a parent’s bank account to you - that is usually enough to stop this tribunal doing what it is supposed to do.

Step 3. A tricky part. You need to persuade a hospital geriatric specialist that legally a person has ‘Testament Capacity’ if he or she remembers the siblings names. While not a medical diagnosis, a specialist may be persuaded by a lawyer that this is the legal definition and may be compelled to produce a report stating even though the patient has 90% brain dysfunction, he or she has retained their ‘Testament Capacity’. In fact, only a medical-legal firms can legally produce reports for courts but some lawyers know how to bypass this: by inventing a legal definition and then convincing a medical doctor of this definition. Once you are armed with such a letter you can engineer a new Last Will and Testament leaving everything to yourself. A typical life space for Alzheimer's after diagnosis is 7 years. By the time you arrange this scam the parent may only have two years to live. (Note: in Alzheimer’s long term memories may become mixed up but are usually retained. Short term memories are not. It would be extremely rare for an Alzheimer’s victim not to recall his or her sibling names. Some functions, such as understanding how to answer a telephone or what it is used for, can disappear even though you would think this is a long term memory. In fact, even when a button is put around an Alzheimer's person’s neck that he or she can press if she falls and can’t get up - chances are she or he will not understand and not use. It is also unlikely an Alzheimer’s victim understands that he or she has become incontinent. An explanation the patient will offer for urine on the floor might be “who spilled water again?”)

But why and how can scams work? A Supreme Court, by their decisions, defines precedents. These can dilute or replace a law passed by government and can even defecate on a law. The inheritance laws are one example. Governments had tried to stop the Supreme Court defecating on these (by for example defining absurd ‘legal definitions’) but to no avail. So they put into place a ‘Family Provisions Act’ which means any sibling left out of a Last Will and Testament is entitled to a fare share of assets of the deceased. This appears to work - but only if you represent yourself and the court will have no choice but to appoint a lawyer at no cost to you. The Supreme Court has to do this. The lower courts don’t. If you choose to hire a legal firm and pay the costs, chances are that any dispute of a Last Will and Testament will end up costing more in legal fees than the assets are worth. Even if the assets are into millions! Legal firms arrange all manner of money making schemes such as ‘forensic accounting’. The reality is, as one court officer told the author, in most cases of such disputes the opposing parties end up with nothing and often have to pay a legal bill worth more than the assets are worth. A ‘den of thieves’ may be an apt name for modern courts of law.

How can courts be that stupid?

Law is a narrow intellectualism. An area of the brain no larger than perhaps a golf ball is used. That active area is the ‘reality’ of magistrates and judges and some tribunal members. It is not a full human brain, not like everyone else understands reality.

Example. In NSW in 2025 if you are a man who accidentally touches your 5-year-old daughter’s private area, perhaps while checking if she has wet the bed and she turns, you can be charged by NSW police with ‘sexual intercourse with a minor’. The legal definition has been so twisted and perverted from natural reality that many things are legally ‘sexual intercourse’.

How can an intelligent person who studies law, wants to be a lawyer to make money, end up with an intellectual capacity of a 12-year-old? The finding does not apply to lawyers only to those who want judicial positions. It has to do with how the brain works. In neuroscience this is called ‘neuroplasticity’. It means the brain reduces its pathways to better accommodate what the individual is about. Because criminals, in general, have low intelligence, magistrates and judges begin to reduce their intellectual capacity to better understand such people. This, coupled with the narrow intellectualism, after a time results in a mental capacity of a willful 12-year-old.

You also need to appreciate that a court order will be forced on anyone by a paramilitary force called police. Armed to the teeth. They are about protecting the haves from those who have little or naught. Police are not paid to think and reason about court orders, but to force these on people. That means some magistrates and judges may literally believe they are ‘god’ in control of an army of angels (when a mental illness strikes a judge the result may not be that clear. In one study in the USA one judge began to let murderers go free and imprisoned for life a person who jay walked! Another judge was killed by a sheriff. You can find the video on YouTube. The reason is not clear but rumor says this judge had defined his own brothel by threatening attractive women with jail or to work in his brothel. The mistake he made, so the rumor mill says, was to include the sheriff’s daughter in his calculations. The reward was point blank shot to the head in his own office.)