Email: med5gl@gmail.com About Us Contact Us Privacy Policy
Books and Novels and Payments
About Psycholegalanalysis
Psycholegalanalysis is a by-product of 5GL-Doctor Medical Diagnosis Aid/Expert System computer software. A pattern matching engine which uses mathematics and a pseudo ‘neural network’.
The CMPL (Clinical Manual of Psycholegalanalysis) may be of interest to psychiatrists.
In some situations psychiatry may not apply. Example is a religion. A religion may
contain magical beliefs and grandiose delusions but because it is a cultural belief
it does not qualify as a mental illness. Possibly this may apply to courts of law
and police? These people may no longer understand ethics and morals and right and
wrong in the way natural people understand. Depending on country, judicial corruption
varies. In modern countries an estimate is that 1 in 10 judicial decisions are the
result of corrupt conduct of some kind. The nature of corruption can vary. Example.
In the USA a sheriff killed a judge (link). The rumor is that this judge set up a
teenage brothel in exchange for not sending an attractive teenager to prison.
The diagnostic criteria is intended more at an ‘intuitive level’.
Before an explanation of how this came about, and while the input to this research was limited, the conclusion is this. Those into LAW use a narrow intellectualism which is unlikely to utilize more of the brain than the size of a golf ball. Such people may not be ‘normal’ by the standards of society but are ‘normal’ and ‘rational’ in their own mind because their focus on ‘reality’ is that golf ball and not the complete brain. Examples (relevant to law in the year 2026 in the State of New South Wales, Australia). When a man touches any part of the female genitalia that is legally defined as ‘sexual intercourse’. Yes! Sexual intercourse! Hence say a 5-year-old still needs changing when wet. If a father does this and unintentionally cleans or touches the genitalia, he can be charged by NSW police with “sexual intercourse with a minor.” Is that not unreality in the extreme? A naive jury who listens to such legal definitions, because the judge in charge may reinforce this definition on the jury, may convict such a father. What happens in prison? He becomes known as a predator who had sexual intercourse with a 5-year-old. His life is probably very short in prison. (You may think no police would charge such a father. Think again! Some of these types will arrest a person visiting a dying parent in a nursing home when a restraining order is in place - a court order engineered by an officer of the court who knows a technique to engineer a new Last Will and Testament to legally steal the wealth of the parent. In general, police are non-human in their mindset, conditioned to believe courts of law are sacred cows and killing people in the name of a court order is ‘okay’. You don’t think so? In the 1970’s these things and their SWAT teams would arrest young people who refused to participate in dropping agent orange on Vietnamese children. Do you really believe those who want to become police officers (or magistrates or judges) are normal rational human beings in the first place?)
A more cunning example is the matter of AVO’s. Restraining orders. Sold to the naive public as to protect a person from violence. Should police apply for such there is likely a need – but there need not be a need! Any lawyer can obtain an AVO automatically by saying his or her client is afraid of so and so. No evidence required. No case of need needs to be made, or a case can be invented with no actual hard evidence required. This became the case by the stupidity of the NSW Supreme Court which decided lawyers can obtain these with no evidence of need. So, why is this a problem? Such an AVO can be obtained to protect child sexual abuse. Yes, to protect it! (Not to stop it, but to let it continue to take place under the protection of the court). An AVO can be obtained to gain leverage in cases of divorce or neighbor disputes. It can be used to isolate a family from a person with extreme brain damage and then organize a new Last Will and Testament leaving all to the person who knows this scam. Technically, only an authorized medico-legal firm can produce medical reports for courts. In reality this is bypassed by a lawyer persuading a young ego driven geriatric specialist in a public hospital that, for example, ‘Testament Capacity’ is a legal term and has this or that definition. The naive ego driven doctor believes and produces a report that a person even with 98% brain dysfunction has still retained their ‘Testament Capacity’. This is not a medical diagnosis of any kind, however, because any medical doctor is considered an expert witness in a court of law, such a report has to be accepted and a new Last Will and Testament engineered by the scammer’s legal firm can pass probate. An AVO can also grant a scammer sole access to a mentally dysfunctional person’s bank account. An example of “legal stealing” using the courts. (Note: medicine is a highly specialized field. A typical geriatric specialist may understand very little about the brain and its dysfunctions. A psychiatrist, on the other hand, would never suggest a person with brain damage has retained their ‘Testament Capacity’. One reason is that this is not a medical term or diagnosis. Another is because essential information and decision making is scattered across the brain - damage to any part destroys soundness of mind.)
Note that while a normal and rational person may quickly understand a scam being put into place with an AVO, a magistrate or judge is not allowed to project intelligently into the future because legally that is ‘speculation’ with no evidence (to the golf ball in the judge’s brain) while probably self-evident to normal and rational and intelligent people.
Note that the narrow intellectualism of law results in no understanding of natural right and wrong in the way most normal people understand. For example. In NSW any dispute of a Last Will and Testament is likely to result in the parties not obtaining any money from a deceased estate but actually owing money to lawyers. This is not ‘wrong’ in the eyes of the courts. In Australia, perhaps true of other countries, lawyers have the potential to make huge money from almost any dispute. Not because there is much skill involved - but because they can! The Supreme Court approves such huge money making by lawyers (after all, such are their buddies, mates, worshipers).
While the CMPL is specific to a legal background (e.g. some police, lawyers, judges or similar), people in organizations may follow “rules” or “guidelines” or “theories” which they may not understand as “law” but which the brain processes in the same way. However, the CMPL does not apply to religious organizations which may have their own equivalent of courts. By a clinical definition religion is folklore and magical beliefs and outside the scope of psychiatry.
Anthropological view. By 2026 less than 50% of Australians have an Anglo-Saxon background. But say 50 years ago the Anglo-Saxon Australian would call new Australians as ‘wogs’ and would take pleasure in labeling such as violent. While the Anglo-Saxon Australian is now a minority (and often not liked by Australians) such control politics, courts and police. This traditional hate of migrants by Anglo-Saxon Australians could be the reason a Supreme Courts destroys the intent of laws as passed by government to allow any lawyer to obtain a restraining order with no evidence required - by ‘law’ any lawyer is an ‘officer of the court’ and whatever lies such invent, as long as not proven outright as lies, are acceptable. Of course, a police force is essential for a modern society but that basically refers to murder and violence - while restraining orders and other orders may have nothing to do with violence but may be used for legal scams, in the main to legally steal property and bank accounts or to protect child sexual abuse. (Give a soldier or police officer a gun and they may become ‘gods’ in their mindset waiting for the opportunity to experience the thrill of a kill. In 2026 a man named Dezi Freeman was killed by police. Later police claimed they found thousands of child abuse images on his computer. This man had been living without electricity for seven or more moths - so how was he downloading child abuse images?)
How CMPL came about
It came about during the development of 5GL-Doctor Medical Diagnosis Aid. An artificial intelligence patterns matching software. When you are working on developing that kind of software, an ‘energy system’ (ES) in the brain forms its own association area and ‘thinks’ in its own way. To further test some of algorithms in 5GL-Doctor, lots of legal cases were included to test how effective the pattern matching techniques. Then suddenly and unexpectedly the CMPL came out from that ES. (Not the original intention but worth documenting in this book. The reason for using examples unrelated to medicine was to test the reliability of the pattern matching algorithms. If you are a psychiatrist or a psychologist you need to form your own opinion about any of the conclusions (diagnosis) presented).
(Some links: link to National Library of Medicine, link to Psychology Today, link to Paraphilias in Sexual Disorders, link to Impact on a normal person (not judges who may believe they are immune from being human) of sexual legal cases)
Prior to examples of conclusions consider:
The 5GL-Doctor Medical AID AI identified a ‘mental switch’ likely in the non-coding part of DNA, and which works in those who are police officers. It might apply to others.
What does the switch do? The NAZI Concentration camp guards were German police. Capable of brutality and horror unlike what people can imagine or believe. And yet, after the war studies of such people concluded they were good family men: gentle and kind and empathetic and loyal and loving (to their own family and friends).
The only way this is possible is if, in some situations, a natural switch changes completely the way the brain works. Thus any police officer in any country in the world, while might seem a decent person, could in theory be switched to be a guard at a Concentration camp.
Why the name ‘Neanderthal Switch’? Neanderthal man is considered extinct. It is known from DNA studies Neanderthals sometimes mated with homo sapiens. One difference identified, that stands out in the DNA of Neanderthals, is in the non-coding part of DNA. That means no one knows what it did.
Can this switch malfunction? On YouTube there are clips (sample link) to do with police officers who committed murder and other offenses. One police woman walked into an apartment of a neighbor and shot him, then claimed she walked into the wrong apartment and thought this was an intruder. Of course, these ‘defense’ claims are invented by lawyers who specialize in confusing a jury. Witnesses said they heard a woman knocking on the door of the victim’s apartment. There appears to be no motive (link) as to why this police officer killed the victim, hence possibly the switch malfunctioned.
Example of a conclusion (diagnosis)
Conclusion (Diagnosis) of Manipulation of Jury by a Judge
This may take place when a presiding judge believes a jury will find a defendant not guilty. In an attempt to influence the jury, the judge may stress legal definitions to the jury and emphasize that this is a court of law and legal definitions are what this is about.
Example. Jury trial 2025. Judge presumably from Sydney.
Man charged with many related offences including ‘sexual intercourse with a minor’. The jury found the man not guilty on all counts. It would have been clear to the judge that the jury would not find the person guilty of anything, so before the jury retired he stressed and emphasized to the jury to obverse legal definitions. The point of a jury is so they can decide of their own free will in accordance with their life experiences, and not by legal definitions. In the state of NSW, Australia, any man touching a part of a female genitalia, accidentally or not, that can be legally defined as ‘sexual intercourse’. In that particular case, the many charges were an aghast to the jury because there was no suggestion of ‘sexual intercourse’ to any member of the jury, the jury members decided to use a normal understanding of ‘sexual intercourse’ and not the legal definition.
In this particular case, it appears the judge also did not allow the jury to hear what happened that led to a mother who made this complaint on behalf of her daughter being ‘evicted’ from the house which was occupied by this family. The house, possibly rented, in the man’s name. The mother had a history of stays in a psychiatric hospital and was known to be a daily user of marihuana (street marihuana, not clinical marihuana). To the jury, the whole situation was bizarre and why did the police lay charges in the first place? The actual police interview with the claimed victim looked like it was the police telling the teenage girl what to say and how to say it. Most of the time when confronted with an allegation, by police, the teenager would either say nothing or ‘ah’ and then the police appeared to be telling her what happened and she repeated what they said. This particular teenager had repeated kindergarten. Teachers suggest that the only way a person repeats kindergarten is if they are intellectually slow. Possibly the reason the girl appeared to repeat what the police were telling her happened (and that appeared to be a story her mother invented.)
It is worth noting that in this case the jury was seriously confounded by a claimed relationship of the mother with another man who lived far away but whom she had never met in true life. So confused about this a clarification was requested. This turned out to be some kind of ‘Internet’ or ‘Play Station’ relationship which the mother, but this is apparently common nowadays, considered equivalent to a physical sexual relationship – and the reason for total confusion of the jury when hearing sentences such as “we have never met but have had sex”.
It is possible this judge also suppressed other relevant evidence. This teenager, a highly attractive one (as opposite to her mother), at one time sneaked out of her house at 3 am to meet a boyfriend in a park. Some time after, but how long after is not clear, her father (the man; the accused) brought her to Dubbo for an ultrasound. Soon after she was sent to stay in Sydney for a while. While a judge may not be educated enough to understand the connection, some jury members would be educated to connect the dots. So suppressing such relevant facts on the grounds ‘not relevant’ denies the jury understanding the picture as a whole.
The ‘golf size brain used’ by a judge may have no understanding of reality as normal intelligent people understand. Bear in mind that police are not about arguing with a court order but to, if necessary, even kill in order to shove a court order down a person’s throat. That means those who are judges or magistrates may have an ‘ego’ no psychiatrist has ever tried to fathom. (Compare: would a President of an outlaw biker group, say Hell’s Angels in the USA, having tens of thousands of serious strong people at his command to do his WILL, would he or she have the same ego as the average mentally healthy individual?)
Prior to the suggested diagnosis criteria for this conclusion, consider this hypothetical (not as much of a hypothetical as you might think!)
A single father lives with his 9-year-old. She still has a bed wetting problem. The father has to leave early for work but before doing this, this is the medical advice, he has to check if his daughter has wet herself. If so she has to be woken up and have a shower. One time when he checks she turns in her sleep and his finger touches her private area. This comes to the attention of a nosy neighbor who does not like the father. She works out, knowing a bit about the law, that the father can be charged with ‘sexual intercourse with a minor’. That is the legal definition of ‘sexual intercourse’ in NSW in Australia in 2025. (Not likely the politicians did this. A supreme court can defecate on any law by their decisions which can effectively replace the law or dilute it, or as may be more common, open the way for lawyers to make more and more money from arguments about the law as the court has redesigned it). The father is so charged. A criminal matter so a jury will need to hear it. The prosecutor, perhaps thinking this is a ‘sick charge’, finds out from the same neighbor about incidences such as “Once I saw him touching her leg ”. So the prosecutor starts inventing a host of charges to convince the jury that there is a pattern of sexual molestations and hence the most serious charge ‘sexual intercourse with a minor’ must surely apply. (And if you think police are not that callous, think again! In NSW these people will charge a person visiting a dying parent in a nursing home - background: one relative, a scammer, has arranged for an AVO to isolate the family from the parent with very serious brain damage, so the scammer’s legal firm can engineer a new Last Will and Testament. The scammer shows this AVO to the person in charge of the nursing home and such is explained that the police have to be called if this or that person comes to visit the dying parent).
Think about what a police officer or soldier is. An enforcer of a WILL. To do this correctly such have to lose their natural ego, their sense of right and wrong, their sense of ethics and morals, and just be a WILL.
Note that the mindset of those into military or law is conditioned not to be much different to the religious believer. Nothing else matters only what a believer is conditioned to ‘believe’ and wants to believe. A believer may be prepared to kill in the name of their beliefs.
Typically, police and lawyers are not allowed to be on a jury. These people don’t have a normal natural reality test (ego) in the same way that people have. In other words, they have a mind enclosed by a WILL.
In this regard, consider a section about ‘Intelligent Evolution’ from ‘The Science of LIFE’. (The e-book edition. The printed edition is usually a few months behind the e-book edition).
21.19 Subhumans
Definition of ‘subhuman’ in the Marriam-Webster dictionary: failing to attain the level (as of morality or intelligence) associated with normal human beings.
At the risk of political correctness, in this science not all who look like human beings have descended from the same lineage. According to classical evolution Cro-Magnum Man sometimes mated with Neanderthals. Clearly, the very foundation of the instinct of a child would have been different. Given the Netherlands became extinct, this suggests a natural instinct not suitable for better evolution. Hence in some human beings there may be a retarded instinct compared to the majority. Let’s define some basic categories based on instinctive drives.
Subhuman type 5. The serial killer who comes from a safe and privileged background. The instinct of such has regular craving to kill another person. (kill=posses?)
Subhuman type 4: Anyone in the military which by its nature is about killing and horror. (This may not apply in a war situation or for those forced to be in a military.)
Subhuman type 3: Police and lawyers and courts of law. By their nature these people restrict their ‘reality’ to law and legal definitions, in so doing reducing the effective reasoning area in the brain. This is not possible unless the instinct allows this.
Subhuman type 2: Focuses on material success and personal image. Might be heavily into a religion.
Subhuman type 1: Achieves personal wealth and prestige by appearing to assist others but in reality their instinct is the same as in subhuman type 2. Politicians may be an example.
Human being: Rarely concerned about wealth or image but might be because a certain amount of wealth is necessary for survival and comfort in life. Adjusts to reality as it exists within a culture or group. More likely to volunteer for charities and may have deep true empathy with the disadvantaged.
Wait for language choices: