Email: med5gl@gmail.com About Us Contact Us Privacy Policy
Books and Novels and Payments
Psycholegalanalysis is a by-product of 5GL-Doctor Medical Diagnosis Aid/Expert System computer software. A pattern matching engine which uses mathematics and a pseudo ‘neural network’. While there is an old paperback copy available, you want the up to date e-book version.
Only a few Australian legal case studies (from the state of NSW) have been used. In general, Australians agree the legal system is not good and mainly a money making enterprise (link to article). As to police. In general, appear to be loathed by people but their use to stop violence is approved by people. (Why loathed? Perhaps because ‘law’ is there to protect the rich from the poor and not because ‘we all live by the same rules’. Police are conditioned not to think or reason about orders of court but accept these as the ‘voice of authority’. Ordinary people tend to think about right and wrong while those into law enforcement usually don’t - because they can force their WILL on you with their muscles and guns and machine guns and the arrogance of thugs.)
The CMPL is specifically intended for psychiatrists and clinical psychologists. CMPL is the product of artificial intelligence style processing. The AI used has its own way of producing results. This AI concludes that the narrow intellectualism that is law will, over time, reduce the intellectual capacity of magistrates and judges to that of a 12-year-old. (If you read some affidavits you might understand why). Narrow intellectualism starts using less and less of the brain until only about the size of a golf ball is useful. This intellectualism may have little to do with reality. Example: in 2025, in NSW, Australia, a man accidentally touching a female child’s private area can be charged by NSW police with ‘sexual intercourse with a minor’. (This from actual jury hearing case in 2025. The man was found not guilty on all counts, some of which were ‘sick’ charges. The girl was 11 but still wet her bed. The mother was unreliable. While the father was checking this one time she turned in bed. The mother, as it appeared, wanting to make trouble for her partner, told police and police charged the man with ‘sexual intercourse with a minor’. A few other similar ‘sick’ charges as well.)
(Extract from ‘The Science of LIFE’ about AI: Modern AI uses chips known as AI chips (also known as NPU’s; Neural Processing Units) optimized for parallel processing. A huge number of CPU’s (central processing units; core of a computer and smart phones) can think ‘together’. Hence millions of operations (calculations; logic) can be done at the same time. (Whereas in a typical CPU such would have to be done sequentially. If billions of items of data are being processed, such a huge volume would be relatively slow on a CPU but need not be slow when AI chips link to other AI chips.) Artificial intelligence does not read sentences like humans. It breaks text into numerical pieces and calculates mathematical relationships to find a meaning.)
Example of a conclusion (diagnosis)
Alzheimer’s Scam
Research into this spanned years with this conclusion first put together perhaps in perhaps 2008. It is likely the same legal conditions exist in Australia in the state of NSW when you are reading this. An ‘AVO’ referred to herein is an order that stops a person seeing someone. Supposedly to protect a person from violence. A no contact order, but it can be much more than this. The threat is prison. An AVO, any court order, is enforced by tens of thousands of people called police armed with guns and machine guns and arrogance and conditioned to accept a court order as a sacred cow. Some in society consider police as dangerous thugs who will not hesitate to kill to force a court order down your throat.
Setting: A mother with Alzheimer’s. By the time of diagnosis until death is about 7 years. The woman has been divorced for decades. She has two siblings. Sibling 1 and 2. Half brothers. Sibling 1 much older that sibling 2. By the time this scam is put into place the parent has up to 90% intellectual impairment. She is incontinent in both ways and the floor has to be continually cleaned. She no longer understands how to use a telephone or answer it. She has an emergency button around her neck, because if she falls she can’t stand up, but she can’t recall what it is and how to use it. Her conversation can seem jovial but can repeat itself every few minutes. Her short term memory is almost not there. A few minutes after sibling 1 takes her shopping, she no longer recalls where she had been. Some longer memories are also affected. At times when out with sibling 1 she confuses a place with a city she remembers from eastern Europe.
An adult sibling, sibling 2, lives in the same house. Sibling 1 regularly visits and takes her shopping or to medical appointments (she walks with a frame). In this situation the sibling living with the parent was also a lawyer but perhaps not a wealthy lawyer. Other than the suggested date of 2008 no other dates are useful since this scam takes years to complete.
The sibling who comes to visit say every few weeks, sibling 1, has his his own family and the ‘power of attorney’ for the mother. All household bills for his mother’s house come to him. This had been arranged perhaps two years beforehand. The mother was still able to use the telephone and had to advise the insurance company and council that she is asking her son (sibling 1) to look after her finances. She told the person on the phone that she is giving sibling 1 power of attorney, but this was never formally written down on paper. The reason this came about was because upon arriving at his mother’s house, sibling 1 discovered (in a draw) ‘final notices’ from various bodies such as the electricity supplier. From that time he made sure her bills were sent to his address and not the mother’s. (Every change like this required the mother to tell the person on the phone that yes, she is giving her son (sibling 1) the power of attorney).
It is possible the lawyer has a drug problem. He seems to be often accessing his mother’s bank account.
It is known in medicine that when a parent has brain damage that can affect the siblings of that parent.
The scam begins when the sibling who has power of attorney arrives at his mother’s house. With him two of his mother’s bills that have to be paid, one is rates. The half brother, sibling 2, is not there. Sibling 1 can’t find his mother’s ATM card which he needs to withdraw the money to pay these bills. When the other sibling arrives he refuses to hand over his mother’s ATM card. As he walks into the kitchen he falls, or pretends to fall. Then he rushes to his room and calls police claiming he was assaulted. Police arrive. Examine the bills that have to be paid. Note that the floor is likely slippery because the mother is incontinent and the floor is continually wet and mopped but remains slippery. They leave.
The sibling now prepares an AVO and rushes to a magistrate to have it signed. This AVO, a court order supposedly to protect a person from violence, can be used for a number of scams such as pressure in a divorce matter. When an AVO is applied for by a lawyer, because the police refuse to do so, no evidence of any kind is required. All a person claims is that they are afraid of someone. (At some hearings you may see such a person ‘shaking with fear’ - an act.)
Because sibling 2 is a lawyer, he knows how to obtain signatures from courts and knows any claim he makes can’t be tested unless there is evidence to the contrary. It can’t be tested as such because he is a lawyer hence an ‘officer of the court’ and legally his claims have to be accepted unless proved otherwise. On the AVO he stops family members coming to see the mother and gives himself sole access to his mother’s bank account.
The other sibling does not have an economic relationship with his wife and can’t afford the money for an expensive barrister (lawyer) like the other sibling is using. At the time neither did he have his usual work.
At a hearing it is clear the magistrate is a carnal minded person. He or she judges a person by what he does and how much money he or she has and what clothes they wear and how they live. This is why it is easy to persuade a magistrate that a person who has to represent themselves is ‘not right in the head’. Problem with self-representation is that you are automatically assumed ‘guilty’ of whatever it is that is claimed, and also these people called magistrates and judges use a narrow intellectualism that is nothing like normal rational thinking,
A court order, an AVO, in theory to protect a person from violence, but in Australia in NSW it has been, as it appears, defecated on by the Supreme court which allowed no evidence of need, only a claim of fear, to be used as the basis of an AVO. Any decision of a Supreme court becomes ‘law’ and can completely dilute, negate, or even defecate on, any law passed by government.
Once sibling 1 has the AVO he arranges for a public hospital geriatric specialist to write a statement that the mother with Alzheimer’s still has ‘testament capacity’ and wants to change her Last Will and Testament to leave everything to this sibling. This lawyer tells the geriatric specialist that legally ‘testament capacity’ means the mother still recalls the names of her siblings. Since that is a long term memory function most Alzheimer’s patients can recall. The naive geriatric specialist accepts this and writes such a statement. That statement will be used at a probate hearing to claim the Last Will and Testament of the deceased mother is valid. (The Will was prepared by the lawyer without the mother having any understanding of this.)
Any medical doctor is considered an ‘expert witness’ in a court of law even when their specialty has nothing to do with the subject matter. A geriatric specialist would know very little about brain damage. (Medicine is a highly specialized and controlled field. As a medical doctor either you qualify in an area, or you refrain - but ‘testament capacity’ is not a medical diagnosis - only an invented term).
In time the other sibling, now left out of the Last Will and Testament, applies for some money from the Last Will and Testament under a ‘family provisions act’ and receives probably half the wealth. As his mother’s true Last Will and Testament wanted it to be. The sibling left out of the Will represented himself in the Supreme court. The judge decided to appoint a barrister for the man (at no cost to him).
Prior to her death, the lawyer sibling who had arranged to the mother to be in a nursing home tells the manager that there is an AVO against family members and should any come to see the parent she is to notify the police. You may think this sibling is evil. No. He is consumed with entitlement and has always blamed his half brother for the parents divorce and now wants to see his half brother in prison for that. Is this entitlement and rage fueled by an addiction? Possibly.
Note that a lawyer may tell you that only an approved legal-medical firm can produce reports for courts. The reality appears to be that any lawyer can bypass this (as has been done in this case).
Also, when this scam was explained on a web page which included a contact telephone number, one person called and explained that he was in such a position but the person who arranged an AVO and a new Last Will and Testament was a neighbor (a police officer). (You may not even be aware of a scam until probate).
Another call that came was from a person who had an AVO against him. He was not to see his young daughter living with his former partner. This man was very worried about the woman’s new ‘man’ in her life and why he was the one who asked the woman to arrange such an AVO.
In Australia, and this could be true in other countries, ‘courts of law’ and police may also be ‘senseless bastards’. Is that because they have guns and weapons and the arrogance of thugs and gangsters and masters? The coldness and callousness of some court orders might surprise you. However, if you are a mental health person you need to consider this in other ways also. According to evolution modern man evolved from Cro-magnon man (or early homo sapiens). Such were known to sometimes mate with Neanderthals who became extinct. The Neanderthal was depicted as primitive, unintelligent, and brutish, and unevolved compared to the Cro-Magnons. Hence in some people there is a ‘Neanderthal’ part of the instinct. Hence a police officer or soldier (during a conflict) may see you in the same way as a lion sees prey. Not as a human being but as an object to control and dominate and to shove human authority down your throat. (It is possible to detect Neanderthal DNA in a person.) In other words, not all who look human are as human as YOU and I!)
Wait for language choices: